Invite Changyu Li, and can’t find Satoshi Nakamoto? Someone can do it.

Suppose someone asks what the real-life versions of the big mysteries in today’s world are. In that case, most people will likely list the mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto’s invisibility and the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines MH307. There are many suspense films with a solid appeal.

Why have these mysteries not been solved so far? If we can invite detective Changyu Li, can he solve this mystery?

Then let’s talk about Satoshi Nakamoto and Changyu Li:

Everyone must be familiar with Satoshi Nakamoto and Bitcoin. On January 3, 2009, the world’s first bitcoin was mined. Afterward, the price of Bitcoin experienced a rocket-like growth of 4 million times, shocking the industry like never before. However, on April 23, 2011, Satoshi Nakamoto sent the last email to a developer; since then, he has disappeared without a trace. Since then, countless people have embarked on a journey to find Satoshi Nakamoto, but they all failed.

Mr. Changyu Li is known as the “Contemporary Sherlock Holmes” and “King of On-site Reconstruction.” He is also the first Chinese-American forensic expert in the history of the United States. He has been a police officer for more than 50 years. His classic cases include the “Trial of the Century” Simpson case, which caused a sensation in the United States, and the suicide case of Clinton’s aide. Every major case has been critically reversed because of his intervention. It can be said that for the most complex criminal cases, if even Mr. Changyu Li cannot solve the case, I am afraid that no one can solve it.

So, if Mr. Changyu Li comes out, can he solve the mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto?

Recently, I accidentally saw a series of articles on the Internet called “Invite Out Satoshi Nakamoto.” The length of this article is not tiny, and it is the most comprehensive, systematic, in-depth, and professional analysis of Satoshi Nakamoto that I have seen. The conclusion is that the real Satoshi Nakamoto does exist, and it is Mr. Wei Dai, a Chinese blockchain expert in the United States. Wei Dai is Chinese, Changyu Li is Chinese, and the author of this article is Chinese—he is Weisha Zhu, a scholar and entrepreneur. In his early years, Zhu was an expert in the computer room of the Institute of Industrial Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. In the era of learning machines, he led the Yuxing team to lead the technological development trend of the age of learning machines in China. Later, Yuxing also successfully launched representative industry products such as computer VCD and IPTV set-top boxes. After he faded out of Yuxing in 2017, he began to concentrate on researching blockchain technology and digital currency technology. Such a person has the unique advantage of studying Satoshi Nakamoto. Technically, he analyzed the ins and outs of Bitcoin from the perspectives of its characteristics, production process, and system composition, checked and locked several representative figures related to it from around the world, and analyzed them one by one. The final target is Wei Dai. It involves in-depth analysis and judgment of finance, encryption technology, and even Bitcoin and Satoshi Nakamoto.

Mr. Zhu must be unprofessional if he is asked to replace Changyu Li to research criminal cases because the field of criminal investigation is a field that requires a lot of skills and experience. For example, if you don’t know how to reconstruct ballistics, identify fingerprints and shoe prints, etc., you can’t restore and uncover the truth based on clues.

Similarly, if Mr. Changyu Li were to investigate and analyze the “candidates” of Satoshi Nakamoto, he would not be able to reproduce the evolution path and technical model of virtual currency technology, as well as fit the product model and character relationship model, no ability to make judgments. Therefore, Changyu Li could not find out the natural body of Satoshi Nakamoto only through criminal investigation knowledge and methods. However, it would also be helpful if scientific criminal investigation analysis methods were applied to the analysis of Satoshi Nakamoto. For example, Mr. Zhu used these methods to reconstruct the communication chain and the “confession” chain between critical figures and presented “network evidence.” The time analysis was accurate to the hour, and the dialogue analysis was accurate to every word. Very convincing statement. Also, I can’t disprove these claims at the moment.

The evidence in this article is so convincing that you won’t believe it. I think Satoshi Nakamoto is the Chinese-American scientist Wei Dai, and I wait for him to show up. All search and deep thinking are the methods used by Mr. Zhu. According to Mr. Zhu, people were looking for Satoshi Nakamoto in the past in inappropriate ways. If the method is suitable, Satoshi Nakamoto will be seen clearly. This article is available online, and you can find it just by searching. Or visit the website;

Sun TV’s link is as follows:

Share this article or Email subscribe:
Follow by Email
X (Twitter)
Visit Us
Follow Me

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top